Back

Marine Corps Body Fat Calculator (Wright)

Accurate assessment of body fat is crucial for maintaining optimal health and fitness. Various methods exist for measuring body fat, each with its strengths and limitations. One such method, known as the Marine Corps Wright Method, provides a practical and reliable way to estimate body fat percentage. This method, developed by Dr. Royce L. Wright, is widely utilized by the United States Marine Corps to assess the body composition of its personnel. In this article, we will delve into the details of the Marine Corps Wright Method, exploring its principles, advantages, and how it differs from other commonly used body fat measurement techniques.

 
Gender Selection: Male
Male
Gender Selection: Female
Female
"
"
 
Your Body Fat Percentage Results
Body Fat Marine Corp Wright male
10.37%
Body Fat (Athletes)

  > 25.0 Obese
  18.0-25.0 Average
  14.0-18.0 Fitness
  6.0-14.0 Athletes
  < 6.0 Essential fat

Understanding the Marine Corps Wright Body Fat Formula

The Marine Corps Wright Method is a tape-measure-based approach that relies on circumference measurements of the waist/abdomen and neck as primary indicators, along with other measurements for females. These measurements are then input into a formula to estimate body fat percentage. The method is considered practical, cost-effective, and suitable for field conditions, making it a preferred choice for military applications.

16.0"
Neck
32.0"
Abdomen
BodyFat(male)=(0.740×abdominal naval in cm)(1.249×neck in cm)+0.985Body Fat (male) = (0.740 \times \text{{abdominal naval in cm}}) \\- (1.249 \times \text{{neck in cm}}) \\+ 0.985
BodyFat(female)=(1.051×upper arm @ mid-upper area in cm)(1.522×forearm in cm)(0.879×neck in cm)+(0.326×abdominal naval in cm)+(0.597×thigh gap in cm)+0.707Body Fat (female) = (1.051 \times \text{{upper arm @ mid-upper area in cm}}) \\- (1.522 \times \text{{forearm in cm}}) \\- (0.879 \times \text{{neck in cm}}) \\+ (0.326 \times \text{{abdominal naval in cm}}) \\+ (0.597 \times \text{{thigh gap in cm}}) \\+ 0.707
  
Neck
17.5"
1.5"
16.25"
0.25"
15.75"
-0.25"
14.5"
-1.5"
A
b
d
o
m
e
n
29.0"
-3.0"
3.0
Essential fat
3.94
Essential fat
5.53
Essential fat
9.49
Athletes
31.1"
-0.9"
3.92
Essential fat
7.89
Athletes
9.47
Athletes
13.44
Athletes
32.0"5.61
Essential fat
9.58
Athletes
11.17
Athletes
15.13
Fitness
32.9"
0.9"
7.31
Athletes
11.27
Athletes
12.86
Athletes
16.82
Fitness
35.0"
3.0"
11.25
Athletes
15.22
Fitness
16.8
Fitness
20.77
Average

Advantages of the Marine Corps Wright Method

  • Cost-Effective and Practical - The Marine Corps Wright Method is a simple and cost-effective way to estimate body fat percentage without the need for specialized equipment. It is particularly advantageous in field conditions where access to advanced measurement tools may be limited.
  • Ease of Administration - The method is easy to administer, requiring minimal training. Unlike some other body fat measurement techniques, it doesn't necessitate highly skilled professionals to perform the assessment, making it accessible to a broader range of users.
  • Applicability to Diverse Populations - While originally developed for military use, the Marine Corps Wright Method has been found to be applicable to diverse populations. Its reliance on basic measurements makes it suitable for a wide range of individuals, regardless of age, fitness level, or physical condition.

Fitmatic's final opinion - Compared to all our other Body Fat Formulas, the Marine Corp Wright formula is better suited for more active individuals and provides a better estimate for Body fat.

Based OnWeightTape MeasureSkinfold
Measurement ComplexityVery EasyEasyDifficult
Accuracy/PrecisionLowMediumHigh
Best Suited ForNon-Active PersonActive EnthusiastAthlete

Comparison with Other Methods

  • Hydrostatic Weighing and DEXA - While hydrostatic weighing and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) are considered gold standards for body fat measurement, they require specialized equipment and trained personnel. The Marine Corps Wright Method provides a more accessible alternative, especially in situations where high-tech equipment is not readily available.
  • Skinfold Caliper Measurements - Skinfold caliper measurements are another common method for estimating body fat percentage. However, caliper measurements can be affected by individual variability and the skill of the person taking the measurements. The Marine Corps Wright Method, being tape-measure-based, eliminates some of these concerns.

Conclusion

The Marine Corps Wright Method stands out as a pragmatic and reliable approach to estimating body fat percentage. Its simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and applicability to diverse populations make it a valuable tool for individuals, fitness professionals, and military personnel alike. While it may not provide the precision of some advanced techniques, its practicality and ease of use contribute to its widespread adoption in various settings. As we continue to prioritize health and fitness, understanding different methods of body fat measurement allows us to make informed choices in pursuit of our wellness goals.

Measurement Help

Neck

How to measure
  • Smallest measurement just below the adams apple
  • Tape measure should be sloping slightly downwards

Abdomen

Body Position
  • Same setup as waist measurement
How to measure
  • Specific location right at your naval (not above or below)
Original Research Paper: "Hodgdon, J. A., & Beckett, M. B. (1984). Prediction of percent body fat for U.S. Navy men and women from body circumferences and height." This seminal research paper, published in the Naval Health Research Center Technical Report, outlines the development and validation of the Navy Body Fat Formula.
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA143890
A Better Way to Measure Fat, Major Ellison, CG 12 (October 24, 2005), Submitted by Captain WW Fairbanks
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA506045