Age
44 Years
Height
183.0 cm
Weight
73.71 KG
Body Fat %
13.76%
Navy Hodgdon
KG
cm
cm
cm
cm
cm
cm

Health Indicators

To determine the current state of your body, Doctors and health industry professionals can refer to three indicators that describe your level of obesity. At Fitmatic, we are taking the same approach, but adding better tools and visualizations to allow you to measure your progress and keep you tied to goals.

 
Body Mass Index (BMI)
The most commonly used indicator using your weight and height.
22.01 Normal
22.01
 

BMI or Body Mass Index is a very commonly used indicator for obesity. The possible ranges for this index are based on your Weight to a reference of Height.

One of the main challenges with this indicator is that it does not take into consideration how the weight is distributed - so it may not be a good reference for any individual that is active and exercising. For this purpose we leverage other mechanisms to help you determine what type of body composition you have based on other formulas.

183.0cm
Height
73.71KG
Weight

Understanding your data

Looking at your current Height we can provide you additional information on what each of the Body Mass Index Ranges represent in actual Weight. This can show you additional reference points based on where you are, have been or would like to be weight wise and how this is mapped to the BMI value ranges.

34.9
116.88 KG
C2 Obese
39.9
133.62 KG
29.9
100.13 KG
C1 Obese
34.9
116.88 KG
24.9
83.39 KG
Overweight
29.9
100.13 KG
18.5
61.95 KG
Normal
24.9
83.39 KG
16.5
55.26 KG
Underweight
18.5
61.95 KG
 
Waist to Hip Ratio (WHR)
Looking at both Waist and Hip to determine level of obesity.
0.88 Good
0.88
 

The Waist to Hip ratio is another commonly used indicator to measure obesity. One of the advantages of this ratio is that both the Waist and the Hip measurement are variable in nature giving a good indication of progress as an individual changes body fat composition.

92.25cm
Hip
81.28cm
Waist

Understanding your data

Knowing that both your waist and hip can change at any given time, how will this translate back into understanding the WHR ranges? Review your Waist vs your Hip to understand how changes scale in reference to this Health Indicator.

  
Waist
68.78
-12.5
77.53
-3.75
81.2885.03
3.75
93.78
12.5
H
i
p
103.5
11.25
0.66
Excellent
0.75
Excellent
0.79
Excellent
0.82
Excellent
0.91
Average
96.75
4.5
0.71
Excellent
0.8
Excellent
0.84
Excellent
0.88
Good
0.97
High
93.0
0.75
0.74
Excellent
0.83
Excellent
0.87
Good
0.91
Average
1.01
Extreme
91.5
-0.75
0.75
Excellent
0.85
Excellent
0.89
Good
0.93
Average
1.02
Extreme
87.75
-4.5
0.78
Excellent
0.88
Good
0.93
Average
0.97
High
1.07
Extreme
81.0
-11.25
0.85
Excellent
0.96
High
1.0
Extreme
1.05
Extreme
1.16
Extreme
 
Waist to Height Ratio (WtHR)
A simpler view at your waist to determine general health.
0.44 Slender and Healthy
0.44
 

The Waist to Height ratio is another commonly used indicator to measure obesity. The possible ranges for this index are based off your static Height and change as your body composition changes for your Waist. It is important to note that only changes in your Waist will have an impact on the value of this indicator.

183.0cm
Height
81.28cm
Waist

Understanding your data

Looking at your current Height we can provide you additional information on what each of the Health Indicator Ranges represent in actual Waist.

0.58
106.14 cm
Extremely Overweight/Obese
0.63
115.29 cm
0.53
96.99 cm
Overweight
0.58
106.14 cm
0.46
84.18 cm
Healthy/Normal Weight
0.53
96.99 cm
0.43
78.69 cm
Slender and Healthy
0.46
84.18 cm
0.35
64.05 cm
Extremely slim
0.43
78.69 cm

Body Fat Analysis

Health indicators give you one view into your composition - the next important piece is looking at your body fat in more detail. There are various ways to measure body fat - we focus on body fat analysis using simple tools of measuring the circumference of various body locations and/or your weight. Finally, you can take it one step further by apply skinfold based measurements - while more difficult to measure, they may provide better accuracy.

 
Navy HodgdonWeight basedPreferred
13.76 Athletes
13.76
 
Based OnWeightTape MeasureSkinfold
Measurement ComplexityVery EasyEasyDifficult
Accuracy/PrecisionLowMediumHigh
Best Suited ForNon-Active PersonActive EnthusiastAthlete
183.0cm
Height
73.71KG
Weight

Understanding your data

You can now get further insights into the body fat ranges to determine how your weight compares against the various levels.

18.0
82.85 KG
Average
25.0
97.94 KG
14.0
74.23 KG
Fitness
18.0
82.85 KG
6.0
56.99 KG
Athletes
14.0
74.23 KG
 
Navy Hodgdon & BeckettMeasurement based
14.7 Fitness
14.7
 
Based OnWeightTape MeasureSkinfold
Measurement ComplexityVery EasyEasyDifficult
Accuracy/PrecisionLowMediumHigh
Best Suited ForNon-Active PersonActive EnthusiastAthlete
183.0cm
Height
38.0cm
Neck
83.82cm
Abdomen

Understanding your data

You can now get further insights into the body fat ranges to determine how both your Neck and Abdomen changes impact the various levels.

  
Neck
41.0
3.0
38.5
0.5
37.5
-0.5
35.0
-3.0
A
b
d
o
m
e
n
76.32
-7.5
5.48
Essential fat
7.87
Athletes
8.78
Athletes
10.99
Athletes
81.57
-2.25
10.34
Athletes
12.47
Athletes
13.3
Athletes
15.29
Fitness
83.8212.26
Athletes
14.3
Fitness
15.09
Fitness
17.0
Fitness
86.07
2.25
14.1
Fitness
16.06
Fitness
16.82
Fitness
18.65
Average
91.32
7.5
18.11
Average
19.9
Average
20.59
Average
22.28
Average
 
Army FriedlMeasurement based
15.46 Fitness
15.46
 
Based OnWeightTape MeasureSkinfold
Measurement ComplexityVery EasyEasyDifficult
Accuracy/PrecisionLowMediumHigh
Best Suited ForNon-Active PersonActive EnthusiastAthlete
183.0cm
Height
38.0cm
Neck
83.82cm
Abdomen

Understanding your data

You can now get further insights into the body fat ranges to determine how both your Neck and Abdomen changes impact the various levels.

  
Neck
41.0
3.0
38.5
0.5
37.5
-0.5
35.0
-3.0
A
b
d
o
m
e
n
76.32
-7.5
7.37
Athletes
9.29
Athletes
10.06
Athletes
11.99
Athletes
81.57
-2.25
11.41
Athletes
13.34
Athletes
14.11
Fitness
16.04
Fitness
83.8213.15
Athletes
15.08
Fitness
15.85
Fitness
17.77
Fitness
86.07
2.25
14.88
Fitness
16.81
Fitness
17.58
Fitness
19.51
Average
91.32
7.5
18.93
Average
20.86
Average
21.63
Average
23.56
Average
 
Marine Corps WrightMeasurement based
15.55 Fitness
15.55
 
Based OnWeightTape MeasureSkinfold
Measurement ComplexityVery EasyEasyDifficult
Accuracy/PrecisionLowMediumHigh
Best Suited ForNon-Active PersonActive EnthusiastAthlete
38.0cm
Neck
83.82cm
Abdomen

Understanding your data

You can now get further insights into the body fat ranges to determine how both your Neck and Abdomen changes impact the various levels.

  
Neck
41.0
3.0
38.5
0.5
37.5
-0.5
35.0
-3.0
A
b
d
o
m
e
n
76.32
-7.5
6.25
Athletes
9.38
Athletes
10.62
Athletes
13.75
Athletes
81.57
-2.25
10.14
Athletes
13.26
Athletes
14.51
Fitness
17.63
Fitness
83.8211.8
Athletes
14.93
Fitness
16.17
Fitness
19.3
Average
86.07
2.25
13.47
Athletes
16.59
Fitness
17.84
Fitness
20.96
Average
91.32
7.5
17.35
Fitness
20.48
Average
21.72
Average
24.85
Average
 
Army VogelMeasurement based
18.54 Average
18.54
 
Based OnWeightTape MeasureSkinfold
Measurement ComplexityVery EasyEasyDifficult
Accuracy/PrecisionLowMediumHigh
Best Suited ForNon-Active PersonActive EnthusiastAthlete
183.0cm
Height
38.0cm
Neck
83.82cm
Abdomen

Understanding your data

You can now get further insights into the body fat ranges to determine how both your Neck and Abdomen changes impact the various levels.

  
Neck
41.0
3.0
38.5
0.5
37.5
-0.5
35.0
-3.0
A
b
d
o
m
e
n
76.32
-7.5
9.89
Athletes
12.17
Athletes
13.03
Athletes
15.11
Fitness
81.57
-2.25
14.5
Fitness
16.48
Fitness
17.25
Fitness
19.08
Average
83.8216.29
Fitness
18.18
Average
18.9
Average
20.65
Average
86.07
2.25
17.99
Fitness
19.79
Average
20.48
Average
22.14
Average
91.32
7.5
21.65
Average
23.26
Average
23.89
Average
25.4
Obese
 
BMIWeight based
20.33 Average
20.33
 
Based OnWeightTape MeasureSkinfold
Measurement ComplexityVery EasyEasyDifficult
Accuracy/PrecisionLowMediumHigh
Best Suited ForNon-Active PersonActive EnthusiastAthlete
44
Age
22.01kg/m2
Body Mass Index (BMI)

Understanding your data

You can now get further insights into the body fat ranges to determine how both your Age and Weight changes impact the various levels.

  
Age
24
-20
38
-6
4450
6
64
20
W
e
i
g
h
t
63.71
-10.0
12.15
Athletes
15.37
Fitness
16.75
Fitness
18.13
Average
21.35
Average
70.71
-3.0
14.66
Fitness
17.88
Fitness
19.26
Average
20.64
Average
23.86
Average
73.7115.73
Fitness
18.95
Average
20.33
Average
21.71
Average
24.93
Average
76.71
3.0
16.81
Fitness
20.03
Average
21.41
Average
22.79
Average
26.01
Obese
83.71
10.0
19.32
Average
22.54
Average
23.92
Average
25.3
Obese
28.52
Obese

Lean Body Mass Analysis

Expanding on the body fat formulas used above, we are taking a closer look at your Lean Body Mass to give you additional insights. Keep in mind, while our body fat formulas are estimate based, they can help greatly in giving you an idea of progress from a muscular perspective.

 
Fat Free Mass Index (FFMI)
Looking at your lean body mass to determine general fitness.
18.8 Average
18.8
 

The fat free Mass index is an indicator primarily focused on muscle composition after having subtracted your body fat based on your current Body Fat Preferences. Similar to the BMI it is based off using your weight and height as a parameter. However, for the FFMI we are removing the fat mass based on the body fat we estimate to only compare your fat free mass (ie lean body mass).

Keep in mind that numbers for FFMI are estimated and driven primarily based on the accuracy of your body fat.

183.0cm
Height
73.71KG
Weight
13.76%
Body FatNavy Hodgdon

Understanding your data

Lean Body Mass and Body Fat go hand in hand. In reality, the Lean Body Mass is an estimate based on your body fat estimate. So it becomes a bit difficult to accurately represent your true lean body mass. As a result, we wanted to make sure we provide you insights into various lean body mass levels, against body fat and the FFMI ranges.

FormulaFFMILean Body MassLBM DifferenceBody Fat
5.0 %
Body Fat
10.0 %
Body Fat
13.76 %
Body Fat
18.76 %(5.0 %)
Unicorn30.0 101.08 KG37.51 KG106.4 KG
112.31 KG
117.2 KG
124.42 KG
Superior (Genetics)28.0 94.38 KG30.81 KG99.35 KG
104.87 KG
109.44 KG
116.17 KG
Superior26.0 87.68 KG24.11 KG92.3 KG
97.43 KG
101.67 KG
107.93 KG
Excellent23.0 77.64 KG14.07 KG81.72 KG
86.26 KG
90.02 KG
95.56 KG
Well above average22.0 74.29 KG10.72 KG78.2 KG
82.54 KG
86.14 KG
91.44 KG
Above Average21.0 70.94 KG7.37 KG74.67 KG
78.82 KG
82.26 KG
87.32 KG
Average20.0 67.59 KG4.02 KG71.15 KG
75.1 KG
78.37 KG
83.2 KG
Your Results18.8 63.57 KGn/a66.92 KG
70.63 KG
73.71 KG
78.25 KG
Well below average18.0 60.89 KG-2.68 KG64.1 KG
67.66 KG
70.61 KG
74.95 KG
 
Lean Body Mass Potential
How much more muscle can you gain?
20.46 kg 
20.46 kg
 

Based on the data we have available for you, we estimate your current lean body mass at approx 63.57 KG.

Various industry experts have created detailed formulas by reviewing natural body builders to try to come up with mechanisms to predict an individual's potential. To better understand your potential we are analysing the following three components:

  Your Lean Body Mass Potential
  The difference of lean body mass that is achievable
  Your potential weight at current body fat levels
183.0cm
Height
25.4cm
Wrist
16.51cm
Ankle
73.71KG
Weight
13.76%
Body FatNavy Hodgdon
Casey Butt, Ph.D.
Casey Butt, Ph.D. analyzed approx. 300 natural bodybuilding champions between the years of 1947 and 2010, in their best condition. Casey's formula is probably the most sophisticated and looking at many measures including Height, Wrist and Ankle to try to predict your potential. For the purposes of this formula we are assuming a body fat level of 10%.
Lean Body Mass Potential
84.03 KG
Difference
20.46 KG
Weight @ your current BF%
97.43 KG
Martin Berkhan
Martin Berkhan refers to your height. One stipulation exists where the lean body mass is assumed at a body fat level of 5%.
Lean Body Mass Potential
83.0 KG
Difference
19.43 KG
Weight @ your current BF%
96.24 KG
Fat Free Mass Index Boundary
Many consider that a Fat Free Mass index of 24 is the upper boundary for natural limits. As a result we look at your Height to calculate your lean body mass at that specific level.
Lean Body Mass Potential
80.99 KG
Difference
17.42 KG
Weight @ your current BF%
93.91 KG
Marc Perry
Marc Perry looks at natural potential with a short hand approach by purely looking at your height to predict a possible maximum. Its simply a scaling formula increasing/decreasing by the same amount for every inch in height.
Lean Body Mass Potential
77.38 KG
Difference
13.81 KG
Weight @ your current BF%
89.72 KG

Understanding Your Data

Obviously your Lean Body mass potential is impacted by your current Body Fat levels, so getting a better idea of where your actual weight has to be based on the different lean body mass levels can provide you additional information to better determine what you should be targetting at different body fat levels.

FormulaLean Body MassLBM DifferenceBody Fat
5.0 %
Body Fat
10.0 %
Body Fat
13.76 %
Body Fat
18.76 %(5.0 %)
Casey Butt, Ph.D.84.03 KG20.46 KG88.45 KG
*93.36 KG
97.43 KG
103.43 KG
Martin Berkhan83.0 KG19.43 KG*87.37 KG
92.22 KG
96.24 KG
102.16 KG
Fat Free Mass Index Boundary80.99 KG17.42 KG85.25 KG
89.98 KG
93.91 KG
99.68 KG
Marc Perry77.38 KG13.81 KG81.45 KG
85.98 KG
89.72 KG
95.25 KG
Your Results63.57 KGn/a66.92 KG
70.63 KG
73.71 KG
78.25 KG
 
Years of Training
How much longer do you have to reach your full potential?
4.08 yrs 
4.08 yrs
 

Now that we have a solid understanding of what your potential Lean Body Mass ranges are, we want to dial in on what this means for you in regards to timing, ie, how long is it going to take you to reach those limits?

Another interesting formula done by Casey Butt in combination with his research to better understand how long it will take you to reach your maximum potential.

25.4cm
Wrist

Annual Gain Potential

Figure out how lean body mass gains scale year over year. You guessed it, 50% aka your "Noob Gains" can be had in the first year of training

Training YearGains For YearGains From Total
Year 113.64 KG51.61%
Year 26.82 KG25.81%
Year 33.41 KG12.9%
Year 41.7 KG6.45%
Year 50.85 KG3.23%
Total26.42 KG100%

Rate Of Gain - Comparisons

Now lets combine it all together, based on the potential lean body mass formula and the rate of gain, we can further determine how much time you have left before you reach your full potential.

Casey Butt, Ph.D.
0.44 Years
of training completed
This is based on the Lean Body Mass Potential Formula Casey Butt, Ph.D. with an estimated max of 84.03 KG
Martin Berkhan
0.51 Years
of training completed
This is based on the Lean Body Mass Potential Formula Martin Berkhan with an estimated max of 83.0 KG
Fat Free Mass Index Boundary
0.66 Years
of training completed
This is based on the Lean Body Mass Potential Formula Fat Free Mass Index Boundary with an estimated max of 80.99 KG
Marc Perry
0.92 Years
of training completed
This is based on the Lean Body Mass Potential Formula Marc Perry with an estimated max of 77.38 KG
 

Sign up for our free Hints & Tips newsletter for a monthly round-up of our top blog posts, calculators, products, and helpful guides so you can take your health and fitness journey to the next level.

Signing up for Hints & Tips indicates agreement to receive related communications from Fitmatic. Your privacy is important to us. We will not sell or rent your information to any third party companies or services.