Age
30 Years
Height
5' 11"
Weight
185.0 lbs
Body Fat %
14.13%
Marine Corps Wright
lbs
"
"
"
"
"
"
"

Body Fat Analysis

Health indicators give you one view into your composition - the next important piece is looking at your body fat in more detail. There are various ways to measure body fat - we focus on body fat analysis using simple tools of measuring the circumference of various body locations and/or your weight. Finally, you can take it one step further by apply skinfold based measurements - while more difficult to measure, they may provide better accuracy.

 
Marine Corps WrightMeasurement basedPreferred
14.13 Fitness
14.13
 
Based OnWeightTape MeasureSkinfold
Measurement ComplexityVery EasyEasyDifficult
Accuracy/PrecisionLowMediumHigh
Best Suited ForNon-Active PersonActive EnthusiastAthlete
16.0"
Neck
34.0"
Abdomen

Understanding your data

You can now get further insights into the body fat ranges to determine how both your Neck and Abdomen changes impact the various levels.

  
Neck
17.5"
1.5"
16.25"
0.25"
15.75"
-0.25"
14.5"
-1.5"
A
b
d
o
m
e
n
31.0"
-3.0"
3.73
Essential fat
7.7
Athletes
9.29
Athletes
13.25
Athletes
33.1"
-0.9"
7.68
Athletes
11.65
Athletes
13.23
Athletes
17.2
Fitness
34.0"9.37
Athletes
13.34
Athletes
14.93
Fitness
18.89
Average
34.9"
0.9"
11.06
Athletes
15.03
Fitness
16.62
Fitness
20.58
Average
37.0"
3.0"
15.01
Fitness
18.98
Average
20.56
Average
24.53
Average
 
Navy Hodgdon & BeckettMeasurement based
15.05 Fitness
15.05
 
Based OnWeightTape MeasureSkinfold
Measurement ComplexityVery EasyEasyDifficult
Accuracy/PrecisionLowMediumHigh
Best Suited ForNon-Active PersonActive EnthusiastAthlete
5' 11"
Height
16.0"
Neck
34.0"
Abdomen

Understanding your data

You can now get further insights into the body fat ranges to determine how both your Neck and Abdomen changes impact the various levels.

  
Neck
17.5"
1.5"
16.25"
0.25"
15.75"
-0.25"
14.5"
-1.5"
A
b
d
o
m
e
n
31.0"
-3.0"
4.86
Essential fat
7.95
Athletes
9.12
Athletes
11.92
Athletes
33.1"
-0.9"
9.93
Athletes
12.67
Athletes
13.72
Athletes
16.24
Fitness
34.0"11.92
Athletes
14.54
Fitness
15.55
Fitness
17.96
Fitness
34.9"
0.9"
13.83
Athletes
16.34
Fitness
17.3
Fitness
19.62
Average
37.0"
3.0"
17.96
Fitness
20.25
Average
21.14
Average
23.27
Average
 
Army FriedlMeasurement based
15.74 Fitness
15.74
 
Based OnWeightTape MeasureSkinfold
Measurement ComplexityVery EasyEasyDifficult
Accuracy/PrecisionLowMediumHigh
Best Suited ForNon-Active PersonActive EnthusiastAthlete
5' 11"
Height
16.0"
Neck
34.0"
Abdomen

Understanding your data

You can now get further insights into the body fat ranges to determine how both your Neck and Abdomen changes impact the various levels.

  
Neck
17.5"
1.5"
16.25"
0.25"
15.75"
-0.25"
14.5"
-1.5"
A
b
d
o
m
e
n
31.0"
-3.0"
6.92
Athletes
9.37
Athletes
10.35
Athletes
12.8
Athletes
33.1"
-0.9"
11.04
Athletes
13.48
Athletes
14.46
Fitness
16.91
Fitness
34.0"12.8
Athletes
15.25
Fitness
16.22
Fitness
18.67
Average
34.9"
0.9"
14.56
Fitness
17.01
Fitness
17.99
Fitness
20.44
Average
37.0"
3.0"
18.67
Average
21.12
Average
22.1
Average
24.55
Average
 
Army VogelMeasurement based
18.9 Average
18.9
 
Based OnWeightTape MeasureSkinfold
Measurement ComplexityVery EasyEasyDifficult
Accuracy/PrecisionLowMediumHigh
Best Suited ForNon-Active PersonActive EnthusiastAthlete
5' 11"
Height
16.0"
Neck
34.0"
Abdomen

Understanding your data

You can now get further insights into the body fat ranges to determine how both your Neck and Abdomen changes impact the various levels.

  
Neck
17.5"
1.5"
16.25"
0.25"
15.75"
-0.25"
14.5"
-1.5"
A
b
d
o
m
e
n
31.0"
-3.0"
9.35
Athletes
12.29
Athletes
13.4
Athletes
16.01
Fitness
33.1"
-0.9"
14.15
Fitness
16.71
Fitness
17.68
Fitness
19.99
Average
34.0"16.01
Fitness
18.44
Average
19.36
Average
21.56
Average
34.9"
0.9"
17.78
Fitness
20.08
Average
20.96
Average
23.06
Average
37.0"
3.0"
21.56
Average
23.63
Average
24.42
Average
26.32
Obese
 
Navy HodgdonWeight based
19.67 Average
19.67
 
Based OnWeightTape MeasureSkinfold
Measurement ComplexityVery EasyEasyDifficult
Accuracy/PrecisionLowMediumHigh
Best Suited ForNon-Active PersonActive EnthusiastAthlete
5' 11"
Height
185.0lbs
Weight

Understanding your data

You can now get further insights into the body fat ranges to determine how your weight compares against the various levels.

18.0
177.09 lbs
Average
25.0
210.28 lbs
14.0
158.13 lbs
Fitness
18.0
177.09 lbs
6.0
120.2 lbs
Athletes
14.0
158.13 lbs
 
BMIWeight based
21.73 Average
21.73
 
Based OnWeightTape MeasureSkinfold
Measurement ComplexityVery EasyEasyDifficult
Accuracy/PrecisionLowMediumHigh
Best Suited ForNon-Active PersonActive EnthusiastAthlete
30
Age
25.86kg/m2
Body Mass Index (BMI)

Understanding your data

You can now get further insights into the body fat ranges to determine how both your Age and Weight changes impact the various levels.

  
Age
10
-20
24
-6
3036
6
50
20
W
e
i
g
h
t
165.0
-20.0
13.77
Athletes
16.99
Fitness
18.37
Average
19.75
Average
22.97
Average
179.0
-6.0
16.12
Fitness
19.34
Average
20.72
Average
22.1
Average
25.32
Obese
185.017.13
Fitness
20.35
Average
21.73
Average
23.11
Average
26.33
Obese
191.0
6.0
18.13
Average
21.35
Average
22.73
Average
24.11
Average
27.33
Obese
205.0
20.0
20.48
Average
23.7
Average
25.08
Obese
26.46
Obese
29.68
Obese

Lean Body Mass Analysis

Expanding on the body fat formulas used above, we are taking a closer look at your Lean Body Mass to give you additional insights. Keep in mind, while our body fat formulas are estimate based, they can help greatly in giving you an idea of progress from a muscular perspective.

 
Fat Free Mass Index (FFMI)
Looking at your lean body mass to determine general fitness.
22.18 Excellent
22.18
 

The fat free Mass index is an indicator primarily focused on muscle composition after having subtracted your body fat based on your current Body Fat Preferences. Similar to the BMI it is based off using your weight and height as a parameter. However, for the FFMI we are removing the fat mass based on the body fat we estimate to only compare your fat free mass (ie lean body mass).

Keep in mind that numbers for FFMI are estimated and driven primarily based on the accuracy of your body fat.

5' 11"
Height
185.0lbs
Weight
14.13%
Body FatMarine Corps Wright

Understanding your data

Lean Body Mass and Body Fat go hand in hand. In reality, the Lean Body Mass is an estimate based on your body fat estimate. So it becomes a bit difficult to accurately represent your true lean body mass. As a result, we wanted to make sure we provide you insights into various lean body mass levels, against body fat and the FFMI ranges.

FormulaFFMILean Body MassLBM DifferenceBody Fat
5.0 %
Body Fat
10.0 %
Body Fat
14.13 %
Body Fat
19.13 %(5.0 %)
Unicorn30.0 214.8 lbs55.94 lbs226.1 lbs
238.66 lbs
250.15 lbs
265.61 lbs
Superior (Genetics)28.0 200.49 lbs41.63 lbs211.04 lbs
222.76 lbs
233.48 lbs
247.92 lbs
Superior26.0 186.18 lbs27.32 lbs195.98 lbs
206.86 lbs
216.82 lbs
230.22 lbs
Excellent23.0 164.71 lbs5.86 lbs173.38 lbs
183.01 lbs
191.82 lbs
203.68 lbs
Your Results22.18 158.86 lbsn/a167.22 lbs
176.51 lbs
185.0 lbs
196.44 lbs
Well above average22.0 157.56 lbs-1.3 lbs165.85 lbs
175.06 lbs
183.49 lbs
194.83 lbs
Above Average21.0 150.4 lbs-8.45 lbs158.32 lbs
167.11 lbs
175.16 lbs
185.99 lbs
Average20.0 143.25 lbs-15.61 lbs150.79 lbs
159.16 lbs
166.82 lbs
177.14 lbs
Well below average18.0 128.94 lbs-29.92 lbs135.72 lbs
143.26 lbs
150.16 lbs
159.44 lbs
 
Lean Body Mass Potential
How much more muscle can you gain?
29.88 lbs 
29.88 lbs
 

Based on the data we have available for you, we estimate your current lean body mass at approx 158.86 lbs.

Various industry experts have created detailed formulas by reviewing natural body builders to try to come up with mechanisms to predict an individual's potential. To better understand your potential we are analysing the following three components:

  Your Lean Body Mass Potential
  The difference of lean body mass that is achievable
  Your potential weight at current body fat levels
5' 11"
Height
7.5"
Wrist
9.5"
Ankle
185.0lbs
Weight
14.13%
Body FatMarine Corps Wright
Casey Butt, Ph.D.
Casey Butt, Ph.D. analyzed approx. 300 natural bodybuilding champions between the years of 1947 and 2010, in their best condition. Casey's formula is probably the most sophisticated and looking at many measures including Height, Wrist and Ankle to try to predict your potential. For the purposes of this formula we are assuming a body fat level of 10%.
Lean Body Mass Potential
188.73 lbs
Difference
29.88 lbs
Weight @ your current BF%
219.8 lbs
Martin Berkhan
Martin Berkhan refers to your height. One stipulation exists where the lean body mass is assumed at a body fat level of 5%.
Lean Body Mass Potential
176.75 lbs
Difference
17.89 lbs
Weight @ your current BF%
205.84 lbs
Fat Free Mass Index Boundary
Many consider that a Fat Free Mass index of 24 is the upper boundary for natural limits. As a result we look at your Height to calculate your lean body mass at that specific level.
Lean Body Mass Potential
171.87 lbs
Difference
13.01 lbs
Weight @ your current BF%
200.15 lbs
Marc Perry
Marc Perry looks at natural potential with a short hand approach by purely looking at your height to predict a possible maximum. Its simply a scaling formula increasing/decreasing by the same amount for every inch in height.
Lean Body Mass Potential
165.0 lbs
Difference
6.14 lbs
Weight @ your current BF%
192.16 lbs

Understanding Your Data

Obviously your Lean Body mass potential is impacted by your current Body Fat levels, so getting a better idea of where your actual weight has to be based on the different lean body mass levels can provide you additional information to better determine what you should be targetting at different body fat levels.

FormulaLean Body MassLBM DifferenceBody Fat
5.0 %
Body Fat
10.0 %
Body Fat
14.13 %
Body Fat
19.13 %(5.0 %)
Casey Butt, Ph.D.188.73 lbs29.88 lbs198.67 lbs
*209.7 lbs
219.8 lbs
233.39 lbs
Martin Berkhan176.75 lbs17.89 lbs*186.05 lbs
196.39 lbs
205.84 lbs
218.56 lbs
Fat Free Mass Index Boundary171.87 lbs13.01 lbs180.91 lbs
190.96 lbs
200.15 lbs
212.53 lbs
Marc Perry165.0 lbs6.14 lbs173.68 lbs
183.33 lbs
192.16 lbs
204.04 lbs
Your Results158.86 lbsn/a167.22 lbs
176.51 lbs
185.0 lbs
196.44 lbs
 
Years of Training
How much longer do you have to reach your full potential?
2.71 yrs 
2.71 yrs
 

Now that we have a solid understanding of what your potential Lean Body Mass ranges are, we want to dial in on what this means for you in regards to timing, ie, how long is it going to take you to reach those limits?

Another interesting formula done by Casey Butt in combination with his research to better understand how long it will take you to reach your maximum potential.

7.5"
Wrist

Annual Gain Potential

Figure out how lean body mass gains scale year over year. You guessed it, 50% aka your "Noob Gains" can be had in the first year of training

Training YearGains For YearGains From Total
Year 116.88 lbs51.61%
Year 28.44 lbs25.81%
Year 34.22 lbs12.9%
Year 42.11 lbs6.45%
Year 51.05 lbs3.23%
Total32.7 lbs100%

Rate Of Gain - Comparisons

Now lets combine it all together, based on the potential lean body mass formula and the rate of gain, we can further determine how much time you have left before you reach your full potential.

Casey Butt, Ph.D.
0.17 Years
of training completed
This is based on the Lean Body Mass Potential Formula Casey Butt, Ph.D. with an estimated max of 188.73 lbs
Martin Berkhan
0.88 Years
of training completed
This is based on the Lean Body Mass Potential Formula Martin Berkhan with an estimated max of 176.75 lbs
Fat Free Mass Index Boundary
1.33 Years
of training completed
This is based on the Lean Body Mass Potential Formula Fat Free Mass Index Boundary with an estimated max of 171.87 lbs
Marc Perry
2.29 Years
of training completed
This is based on the Lean Body Mass Potential Formula Marc Perry with an estimated max of 165.0 lbs

Discover your Potential

Getting a better idea of where you are today and how you compare to various models, you can get additional information on how your current body compares. It may help to highlight specific weaknesses ... you know "oh my legs have always been lagging" (though we kind of know skipping leg days is too easy)

 
Muscular Potential
Discover your potential for muscular composition based on your body frame.
 

Casey Butt, Ph.D. created several equations that predict muscular measurements in lean condition of approximately 8% to 10% body fat. Height, ankle, and wrist circumference are the determining factors.

One caveat is in order: People with uncharacteristically small joints for their frames and/or significantly longer than typical muscle belly lengths may be able to exceed some of these predictions by up to approximately 3%.

Casey Butt, Ph.D. isolates formulas for muscular potential based on being a Hardgainer or an Easygainer. In it's most basic definition a "hardgainer" is simply someone who gains muscle more slowly and with more difficulty than the average trainee. For the purpose of identification of being a hard gainer or not, casey looks closely at a specific ratio of your height in comparison to either wrist or ankle to determine possible growth for your upper and lower body.

The following body measurements were used to be able to determine the values for all of Casey Butt's formulas.

5' 11"
Height
7.5"
Wrist
9.5"
Ankle

Are you a Hardgainer or Easygainer?

If regardless of effort put in, you are having a hard time to put on muscle, you are very likely a hardgainer. We can analyse how much (or not) of a hardgainer you are by looking at your skeletal structure - in this case wrist and ankle and comparing it to your height to identify if you meet the criteria.

Is it easier for you to add muscle on your Upper body or Lower body? The reason maybe your skeletal structure - so depending on how close or far away you are from the target may give you insights why you are having an easyier or harder time with part of your body.

9.2"
3.24%
Ankle 12.96% of Height
Above target, you are NOT considered a hardgainer.
7.42"
1.08%
Wrist 10.45% of Height
Above target, you are NOT considered a hardgainer.

Maximum Potential - Hardgainers

This model applies if you are considered a HARDGAINER, ie your Wrist and Ankle measurements are below the targets.

Neck
17.25"
-7.25%
16.0"
Chest Top
47.75"
n/a
Bicep Flexed
17.1"
-3.51%
16.5"
Forearm Flexed
13.72"
n/a
Thigh Middle
25.17"
n/a
Calf
17.1"
n/a
* All measurement targets are based off approx. 8% to 10% Body Fat.

Maximum Potential - Easygainers

This model applies if you are considered an EASYGAINER, ie your Wrist and Ankle measurements are above the targets.

Neck
17.34"
-7.75%
16.0"
Chest Top
49.21"
n/a
Bicep Flexed
17.8"
-7.31%
16.5"
Forearm Flexed
14.24"
n/a
Thigh Middle
25.99"
n/a
Calf
17.42"
n/a
* All measurement targets are based off approx. 8% to 10% Body Fat.
 
Steve Reeve Model
Compare yourself to symetric ideals of one of the most popular Body builders of our time.
 

Steve Revees inspired thousands worldwide - first as an internationally titled bodybuilder, later as a proponent of Health and Fitness.

The physique of 1940s-1950s bodybuilding legend Steve Reeves will go down in history as being one of the most perfectly proportioned of all time. Many feel his body represents what a bodybuilding physique should look like - flawless and beautiful.

Neck79% of Head
n/a
n/a
Chest Top148% of Hip
n/a
n/a
Bicep Flexed252% of Wrist
18.9"
-12.7%
16.5"
Waist86% of Hip
n/a
n/a
Thigh Middle175% of Knee
n/a
n/a
Calf192% of Ankle
18.24"
n/a
 
Greek Ideals
How do you compare to the Greek Ideals of the past?
 

Based on greek statues and ratios for the original Mr. Olympia. It considers your only measurement of Wrist to calculate your base Greek ratio, your ideal chest. All other comparisons and ratios are based of your calculated chest measurement.

In reality, the equations were based on 1950's and early 1960's Mr. America contestants and were written by a Canadian in 1964, with no reference to ancient Greece whatsoever. Ancient Greek sculpture body proportions were, in fact, much smaller everywhere but the waist. Also found in Stuart McRobert's books Brawn and Beyond Brawn.

All comparisons are based of the core Wrist to Chest Ratio by taking 650% of your wrist as the base line for your chest and comparing to all other body locations.

Core Ratios

Chest Middle650% of Wrist
48.75"
-5.64%
46.0"
Neck37% of Ideal Chest
18.04"
-11.3%
16.0"
Waist70% of Ideal Chest
34.13"
-6.23%
32.0"
Hip85% of Ideal Chest
41.44"
n/a
Bicep Flexed36% of Ideal Chest
17.55"
-5.98%
16.5"
Forearm Flexed29% of Ideal Chest
14.14"
n/a
Thigh Middle53% of Ideal Chest
25.84"
n/a
Calf34% of Ideal Chest
16.58"
n/a

Your Chest Compared

As the formulas are based off an Ideal Chest Ratio, we want to also compare your other measurements to your current Chest measurement to give you a better idea of how close you are at the moment. To say it another way, we are REPLACING the Greek Ideal Chest ratio with your current chest ratio so you can get an idea of how close you are based on your current chest.

Using your own chest as a primary comparison is often a better comparison and provides you better comparisons.

46.0"
Chest Middle
Neck37% of Chest Middle
17.02"
-5.99%
16.0"
Waist70% of Chest Middle
32.2"
-0.62%
32.0"
Hip85% of Chest Middle
39.1"
n/a
Bicep Flexed36% of Chest Middle
16.56"
-0.36%
16.5"
Forearm Flexed29% of Chest Middle
13.34"
n/a
Thigh Middle53% of Chest Middle
24.38"
n/a
Calf34% of Chest Middle
15.64"
n/a
 
Bicep Analysis
Take a deeper look into your Flexed Bicep to determine realistic progress.
 

Everyone loves Big Biceps - now what does it take to get there and how do I realistically analyse where I am today?

First we analyse your current Flexed bicep measures against the various model and of course normalizing your measure against your body fat values - lets face it fat is not muscle - this will give you an idea of how big your arms really are when comparing to your body fat levels.

The final aspect of your arm analysis is focused on understanding increase and decrease in your big ole' arms.

Understanding your Data

Comparing your bicep measurement at your body fat levels against the various Body Models based on Casey Butt, Greek Ideas and Steve Reeve

FormulaTargetBody Fat
5.0 %
Body Fat
10.0 %
Body Fat
14.13 %
Body Fat
19.13 %(5.0 %)
Steve Reeve's Ratios18.9" 18.4"
*18.9"
19.31"
19.81"
Casey Butt - Max Potential17.8" 17.3"
*17.8"
18.21"
18.71"
Greek Ideals17.55" 17.05"
*17.55"
17.96"
18.46"
Casey Butt - Hardgainer Potential17.1" 16.6"
*17.1"
17.51"
18.01"
Your Results16.5" 15.59"
16.09"
16.5"
17.0"

Better Understanding Progress - Volume Analysis

Improving your Flexed Bicep size comes with quite a few challenges that have to be understood to be realistic about progress.

Natural Limits & Progress: As you are increasing the size of your bicep, you are at the same time also getting closer to natural limits - this will slow down progress as you are trying to increase.

Circumference vs Area: The next is understanding the increase in circumference and area that is being occupied. For example, when you add 1" to your 15" arms, you are adding 6.67% in circumference, however, the area required to increase is 13.78% - quite a bit more. As you are adding additional inches to your arm, the area increase will be larger in comparison - so getting bigger arms will become more and more difficult.

In order to better understand this challenge you can use the visual arm progress chart below. Yes we know it maybe a bit hard to read (a tad over engineered again) but it better visualizes how much you truely have to gain to reach certain limits.